Thursday, October 16, 2014

What's this?


In a game changing breakthrough, the Intellectual Property High Court of Japan (IPHCJ) smithfield preowned decision Perfetti Van Melle S.p.A v Rakuten K.K., was a wake-up call to online marketplace operators who could be exposed to trade mark infringement damages or injunction liability smithfield preowned if they do not act within a reasonable time period to remove infringing listings from their websites after receipt of the brand owners notice or have reasonable grounds to believe that infringements have occurred.
Trade mark counterfeiting statistics from the Japanese customs, police and intellectual property authorities provide a nuanced context to the online trade mark infringement battle between two billion dollar litigants. The clash is emblematic of the collision of two developing Japanese trends, its healthily growing e-commerce smithfield preowned marketplace and the increasing online counterfeiting threat from abroad.
What's this?
Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact smithfield preowned our Customer Services Department.


No comments:

Post a Comment